confirm the usefulness and correctness of a collegial management of the party, especially in the current difficulties, but is very concerned about the tightness of the left turn decided by the Congress of Chianciano especially in terms of re-foundation and the building of a communist anti-capitalist alternative to left and right to the PD. Pull back on these two aspects, closely linked to each other, and fall back on a politicized management of that proposed "federation" would result in a moderate and inconclusive results, a different policy. 
My concern is motivated by the fact that this has already happened in Florence in July with the election of a new office based on a majority different from that of Chianciano and very much in continuity with the party that ran the first defeat of the rainbow. There are sharp differences emerged on analysis of the vote in local elections and choices to make in the upcoming regional, both socially and politically. In the report, the Secretary has rightly placed emphasis on the centrality of our social intervention, but there has been no initiation of discussion on the upcoming regional elections and the Congress of the CGIL. I think this no longer be postponed because our presence in the conflicts and issues of the crisis to be effective in need of a proposal, a projection of the political-institutional clear and consistent, both with the contents of the struggles in which we are engaged with both the work of construction of an anti-capitalist left, an alternative to the PD and the logic of bipolarity. I do not like the climate of this shabby and careless CPN: the difficulties of the PRC are not exceeded with tactical agreements and ambiguous, but clearly working to fill a political and social alternative. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment