It 'good that we face in this CPN stock of the political party, because it is opening a new phase, aspects of binding. To respond to the observations of Rinaldi companion on the line or even the policies of the Congress of Chianciano, I believe we can easily say that the Congress of Chianciano expressed a prevailing political line that has saved us from the death of a communist party in Italy, but we must be aware that the party, after the Rainbow Project, is an orphan in a political project, but that the split has caused serious damage, including the most significant is that divided the Left (and does not place the Democratic Party in this training) in two components that are then in open competition with each other and conflicting for now, and since then it is objectively more difficult the action of a communist party who knowingly rejects the approval, and all the compatibility.
However, enlargement of the national secretariat to the second point, I believe that my constituents as not to be forgotten veteran authoritarian and discriminatory actions against minority interior is very sensitive to the issue dell'agibilità policy and collective management structures of the party, so in the name of the concept of internal pluralism and democracy, I evaluate how successful entry into office of two of his companions, who, moreover, have not deemed politically correct vendoliani out with others, in the division that has hurt the party for months and tended to damage it. I also think that the political convergence with the axis of the established political CONGRESS CHIANCIANO will be in the process of osmotic and indeed occurred. The Federation at a glance what I say now may not be absolute: it can not be an announcement of negative developments nor neo-rainbow, or disbanded to a new subject. It 's true that the PRC for the first problem is how to overcome the obstacles of the bipolar world and in this context that created the proposal from the Federation of alternative left that could change not just the prospect of the party: the political point is that we need to increase critical mass of consensus and create a system of alliances broader unified list, but this can not happen without two essential and unavoidable, that the roots and the social credibility. Since the Fed appears to be a compromise between all different needs to be pursued, the proposal is ambiguity on at least two aspects, first of all the issue of transfer of sovereignty of the individuals and secondly, the relationship between Autonomy and Unity. Central therefore, in my opinion, is that you can continue to speak of the Federation without addressing, simultaneously, raise the question of the re-establishment of our party, not in the empty form of enunciation, but in substance, that is to practice and test , otherwise, if you do, you risk decompose, and this could be a step that is then to overcome it. On this subject should be given a clear political message this CPN. 
also because the situation is not good of the party in the territories and I am not referring only to the alarming fact of membership. Indeed the lack of guidance on the rules of operation of the Federation and the absence of clear objectives have caused doubt among the comrades in the confusion and basic approach of the territories, where they were born in these months structures with different, sometimes even contrary to 'idea of \u200b\u200bFederation.
The project so far has appeared to the most confused and uncertain and it served side-by-sometimes to slow down and even capture the political initiative of the associations (with difficulty responding to requests for coordination, liaison between neighboring federations that some common disputes and territorial cohesion in the struggle that comes from the regional structure of the party), sometimes ha dato vita invece a coordinamenti forzosi persino a livello di zona o alla costituzione di circoli unificati , a feste "unitarie".... etc. also because the situation is not good of the party in the territories and I am not referring only to the alarming fact of membership. Indeed the lack of guidance on the rules of operation of the Federation and the absence of clear objectives have caused doubt among the comrades in the confusion and basic approach of the territories, where they were born in these months structures with different, sometimes even contrary to 'idea of \u200b\u200bFederation. Ma penso che il peggio proviene dal dibattito politico in corso nel partito, laddove si sviluppa, e non sempre nel confronto aperto, ( ad es, la Direzione Nazionale di ieri era la prima volta che discuteva di questo Progetto che però è in campo dal 18 luglio), in cui la Federazione per ora è apparsa come un ombrello sotto il quale convivono progetti politici diversi.
Infatti su di essa i compagni di base si fanno domande elementari , ma essenziali fra cui : " La Federazione alla fine sarà la convergenza fra PDCI e Prc?" in questo caso allora la Federazione è solo un escamotage tattico" . And yet some people wonder: "Maybe in the end perhaps the revival neo-rainbow? So the Federation is a tool to build the unitary subject of the Left." And here it is clear that those who want to pursue this goal to overcome, unlike the first, the relationship between two people, between the PDCI and PRC. In any case, these two strains both want to pass the PRC as a political independent and both have a strong underlying attitude, not as nihilistic Bertinotti, but skepticism about the fate of the PRC.
But I think that there is an alternative to the position that these claims be the center of the PRC, it should not be exceeded, because the project of building a Left alternative, which we said was necessitated by election results and the expansion of the consensus for our party, we can sustain and support only if you have at home, as the centerpiece, a Communist Party that imposed by the determination and consistency transformation of society, and for now, for that matter, out of our party, there is no other organization has the basis for a profile like this.
The only credible proposal is therefore to build a left alternative as a field of autonomous force, of course, to expand, of course, that converges in uniform lists, but where the PRC is the main subject, for this purpose on this should concentrate our efforts to make it a party re-established, which is oriented in social conflict, and that the gentlemen at the battle of opposition to the Berlusconi government in the country.
Last point: I agree with the context that the national secretary expressed the limits so far found in the proposed party, to which there has been no overall policy and institutional plan with a central processing a proposal to defeat Berlusconi and create the conditions for a government institution where you received a proportional electoral law, which is essential to overcome the bipolar I, however, correct but unrealistic proposal for a government institution to make the law for six months and then resign, but above this which is circumvented and bypassed the PRC is how we build an opposition in the country that could determine the final outlet. Therefore, the resumption of the conflict to do now is not to be disconnected from the opposition to the Government.
Infatti su di essa i compagni di base si fanno domande elementari , ma essenziali fra cui : " La Federazione alla fine sarà la convergenza fra PDCI e Prc?" in questo caso allora la Federazione è solo un escamotage tattico" . And yet some people wonder: "Maybe in the end perhaps the revival neo-rainbow? So the Federation is a tool to build the unitary subject of the Left." And here it is clear that those who want to pursue this goal to overcome, unlike the first, the relationship between two people, between the PDCI and PRC. In any case, these two strains both want to pass the PRC as a political independent and both have a strong underlying attitude, not as nihilistic Bertinotti, but skepticism about the fate of the PRC.
But I think that there is an alternative to the position that these claims be the center of the PRC, it should not be exceeded, because the project of building a Left alternative, which we said was necessitated by election results and the expansion of the consensus for our party, we can sustain and support only if you have at home, as the centerpiece, a Communist Party that imposed by the determination and consistency transformation of society, and for now, for that matter, out of our party, there is no other organization has the basis for a profile like this.
The only credible proposal is therefore to build a left alternative as a field of autonomous force, of course, to expand, of course, that converges in uniform lists, but where the PRC is the main subject, for this purpose on this should concentrate our efforts to make it a party re-established, which is oriented in social conflict, and that the gentlemen at the battle of opposition to the Berlusconi government in the country.
Last point: I agree with the context that the national secretary expressed the limits so far found in the proposed party, to which there has been no overall policy and institutional plan with a central processing a proposal to defeat Berlusconi and create the conditions for a government institution where you received a proportional electoral law, which is essential to overcome the bipolar I, however, correct but unrealistic proposal for a government institution to make the law for six months and then resign, but above this which is circumvented and bypassed the PRC is how we build an opposition in the country that could determine the final outlet. Therefore, the resumption of the conflict to do now is not to be disconnected from the opposition to the Government.
0 comments:
Post a Comment